What a week…especially for the markets as uncertainty was removed, further supported by a 25-bps cut shot in the arm. And of course, earnings season rolls on, with a new spate of releases, which continue to paint an increasingly challenging market. With Tuesday’s outcome behind us, 2025 is squarely in focus.
We’ll be covering this theme and more in next week’s “Closing the Quarter” Thought Leadership.
Each quarter, we analyze annual revenue and EPS guidance provided by Materials companies with market caps greater than $1B that have reported to date.1 Below are our findings.
For comparison purposes, we provide an “All-Company” benchmark, which tracks in real-time a basket of companies larger than $1B in market cap across all sectors that have reported earnings to date (n = 647).
Industry | Number of Companies |
---|---|
Chemicals | 15 |
Containers & Packaging | 7 |
Construction Materials | 2 |
Metals & Mining | 2 |
Total | 26 |
More Materials companies are lowering annual revenue guidance, largely driven by Chemicals, than the All-Company average (50% vs. 30%, respectively). Additionally, significantly fewer Materials companies are raising revenue guidance compared to the benchmark (10% vs. 39%), while a similar proportion is maintaining guidance (40% vs. 31%).
More Materials companies are lowering annual EPS guides than the All-Company average (38% vs. 25%, respectively). Additionally, fewer Materials companies are raising guidance compared to the overall average (29% vs. 47%), while a similar proportion is maintaining guidance (33% vs. 28%).
We analyzed the earnings calls for this group and the broader Materials sector universe to identify key themes.
This earnings season, executive commentary across the Materials sector reflects a continuation of downbeat trends observed, with executives navigating choppy conditions and elevated macro uncertainty. While performances and outlooks vary by end market, a challenging operating environment persists, with near-term outlooks clouded by myriad factors, including ongoing geopolitical tensions and the eventual outcome of the U.S. presidential election.
Although this week’s Trump victory brings a dose of clarity, executives broadly see challenging current market conditions persisting through year end. Furthermore, despite some cautious optimism for a more supportive economic backdrop next year with the Fed and other central banks seen moving forward with rate cuts alongside China stimulus efforts, executives remain wary of calling the timing of an eventual demand recovery, with hopes more tilted toward the back half of 2025.
Indeed, with reporting season for the sector largely complete, Materials are delivering EPS beats at the lowest rate of any sector, with just 56% topping consensus estimates, compared with 76% for the S&P 500. Additionally, 63% of Materials companies in the S&P 500 are reporting revenue below consensus, compared with 40% for the broader index. Additionally, Materials companies are lowering EPS and revenue guidance at a significantly faster clip than our All-Company average.
Given the challenging environment and uncertain outlook, companies continue to emphasize efforts to protect or expand margins through operational efficiency, productivity gains, rationalization, and expense management. To that end, a number of Materials companies highlight progress with previously introduced cost reduction programs, with some rolling out additional measures. Indeed, one such company, Celanese, pointed to a deterioration of market conditions in the quarter, prompting the firm to temporarily cut its dividend by 95% to support its deleveraging efforts.
Furthermore, with heightened focus on the U.S. election and potential policy actions, commentary around global trade featured heavily during earnings calls, with “tariff” mentions spiking, both for Materials and the broader U.S. corporate landscape. Of note, Steel companies projected optimism for stronger enforcement of trade regulations in 2025, regardless of the election outcome.
While a number of groups within the sector got a sizable post-Election Day bump on Wednesday (Steel names, in particular), the Materials sector remains a YTD laggard relative the broader S&P 500, up roughly 11% on the year as of Thursday’s close, compared with ~25% for the benchmark.
Notably, the sector had closely tracked the S&P 500 since our Q2 publication in August, before diverging to the downside with the onset of earnings in mid-October. Since October 16, when the first S&P 500 Materials companies began reporting, the sector is down 2.3% compared with the 2.2% gain posted by the Index over that span.
Key Earnings Call Themes
Challenging Market Conditions Persist, with Few Pockets of Strength; Execs Point to Near-term Uncertainty on Multiple Fronts, but Are Hopeful for Greater Clarity in the New Year
Industrial and Auto Remain Weak Globally, While Secular Trends —Electrification, AI Data Centers — Offset Weakness for Some; Hope Remains for a Gradual Demand Recovery Next Year with Help from Additional Rate Cuts and Post-election Clarity, But with the Timing Uncertain
Interest Rates
U.S. Election
Amid Sluggish Volume Environment, Execs Highlight Operational Efficiency, Productivity Enhancements, and Cost Reduction Measures (Past and Present)
Cost Reduction Programs
Mentions Jump Heading into the U.S. Election, With Execs Closely Monitoring Evolving Global Trade Dynamics; Steel Industry Looking Forward to Stronger Enforcement of Trade Regulations After Year of Pricing Pressure from Imports
While the equity markets got a shot in the arm this week from the U.S. election, results from the Materials sector this earnings season are yet another reminder that the market is not the economy. Indeed, the sector continued to reflect the complexities and challenges of the current economic landscape. Many of the headwinds called out last quarter persisted in Q3, with executives pointing to expectations for further choppiness into year end.
Not only has this led to an elevated level of earnings misses and lowered guides across the sector, but companies have been leaning further into cost-cutting and restructuring efforts, including layoffs, to navigate through the trough (something we will be diving into deeper next week). In addition, though the U.S. election may have removed a near-term overhang for investors, uncertainty around tariffs and trade will take time to be resolved (another topic we will cover). Amid these shifting dynamics, the message coming out of the Materials sector continues to be one of focusing on what you can control.
Next week, we’ll be back with our “Closing the Quarter” piece to round out the Q3’24 reporting period.
Relatively few Materials companies guide on annual revenues; more typically provide EPS guidance